VanEck CEO Flags Quantum Threat to Bitcoin; Firms to Walk Away?

VanEck CEO Jan van Eck on CNBC:

“There’s something else going on within the Bitcoin community that non-crypto people need to know about.

And that is: ultimately, VanEck has been around before Bitcoin. We will walk away from Bitcoin if we think the thesis is fundamentally… pic

• Also Read :
•   Altcoins Hold Strong as Bitcoin Falls 24% in November 
•   ,

Quantum Timeline Raises the Stakes for Institutions

Another part of the discussion centers on quantum risk. Some voices in the community are calling 2026 a realistic target year for quantum-resistant upgrades.

Vitalik Buterin added his own warning recently, saying there’s a notable chance quantum-capable machines could arrive before 2030. Because blockchain upgrades take years, he urged developers to prepare well before the threat becomes real.

Why This Matters for Bitcoin Holders

If Bitcoin doesn’t move toward post-quantum protection, institutions, regulators, and ETF issuers may eventually push for answers. Privacy concerns may also steer more users toward Zcash or other zero-knowledge networks.

What to Watch Next

Attention now turns to Bitcoin’s developers as the community waits to see whether 2026 becomes a real deadline or another warning left unanswered.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

Subscribe to News

FAQs

What is the quantum computing risk to Bitcoin?

Quantum computers could one day break Bitcoin’s encryption, potentially exposing wallets and transactions. This is a known long-term risk that developers are actively researching.

When will quantum computers break Bitcoin?

Experts suggest a tangible quantum threat could emerge before 2030. However, the Bitcoin community is aware and is developing quantum-resistant upgrades to counter this future risk.

Should I be worried about my Bitcoin investment due to quantum computing?

Not immediately. The threat is considered long-term, and developers have time to implement security upgrades. It’s a topic for future-proofing the network, not a current emergency.